When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. Tried it yesterday. DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. What matters is what users perceive and expect. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Option 2: bypass secure boot Getting the same error with Arch Linux. Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. Have a question about this project? The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". Level 1. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. "+String(e)+r);return new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US').format(Math.round(569086*a+n))}var rng=document.querySelector("#restoro-downloads");rng.innerHTML=gennr();rng.removeAttribute("id");var restoroDownloadLink=document.querySelector("#restoro-download-link"),restoroDownloadArrow=document.querySelector(".restoro-download-arrow"),restoroCloseArrow=document.querySelector("#close-restoro-download-arrow");if(window.navigator.vendor=="Google Inc."){restoroDownloadLink.addEventListener("click",function(){setTimeout(function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="flex"},500),restoroCloseArrow.addEventListener("click",function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="none"})});}. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. So, this is debatable. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Of course , Added. , Laptop based platform: What exactly is the problem? Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. to your account, Hello Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? Thanks! So I apologise for that. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. Agreed. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. My guesd is it does not. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. 4. ext2fsd Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? @steve6375 Okay thanks. E2B and grubfm\agFM legacy mode work OK in their default modes. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. @steve6375 Customizing installed software before installing LM. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced It does not contain efi boot files. Getting the same error as @rderooy. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. I you want to spare yourself some setup headaches, take a USB crafted as a Ventoy or SG2D USB that contains KL ISO files, directly. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. The current Secure Boot implementation should be renamed from "Secure Boot support" to "Secure Boot circumvention/bypass", the documentation should state about its pros and cons, and Ventoy should probably ask to delete enrolled key (or at least include KeyTool, it's open-source). Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. check manjaro-gnome, not working. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. 7. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. Any suggestions, bugs? It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. Help !!!!!!! All other distros can not be booted. Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! . This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? Do I still need to display a warning message? Well occasionally send you account related emails. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes.